I’m not familiar with these shows, but the discussion seems a bit conffused by Ms Hagwood right of the bat, putting the cart before the horse. Clearly she seems to be deranged about the very obvious fact of metrosexuality being caused by female liberation not vice versa. That ‘s only for starts. She then seems to launch into an even more confused placeing of blame of the whole situation or part of such being caused by consumerism rather than just a corelary event. I need to read some more but the discussion seems odd.
I’m not familiar with these shows, but the discussion seems a bit conffused by Ms Hagwood right of the bat, putting the cart before the horse. Clearly she seems to be deranged about the very obvious fact of metrosexuality being caused by female liberation not vice versa. That ‘s only for starts. She then seems to launch into an even more confused placeing of blame of the whole situation or part of such being caused by consumerism rather than just a corelary event. I need to read some more but the discussion seems odd.
Now I really want to know what she means by “the metrosexual state of affairs”. I’m not sure even she knows.
Comments are closed.